THE OFFICIAL 147.450 FLAMEBOOK! THEFLAMEBOOK.COM
W0RKF / AA0IN - THE RETARD Ron Foster
450 Sunday Night Trivia
With your host Sue KD6UVD
8PM Pacific
Listen to 147.450 LIVE:
22,994 Entries
Comments: Cys fucks kids Pat sullivan fucks kids Democrats fuck kids Those that support democrats..fuck kids. Sit at home and fuck kids
Comments: I heard that Roger is living with Tommy and Tammi Prager.
Comments: **THE STEVE HOFFMAN ALLIANCE ** N6ZKZ - STEVE HOFFMAN IS A MODEL HAM.
Comments: haven't heard much from the Buttfuck Brothers lately. Did the Cocksuckers die of Corona Virus in their Winny-Gay-Go? Are these disgusting Bums still buttfucking each other every night? Someone catch a Goat for them! After they fuck it, they can eat it!
Comments: In reply to "Miss Piggy" who said: "Why Hammy Sammy do you only fight for one person that has been supposedly slandered on Flamebook. There are many on this platform that could be eligible for your defense and truth services. Ham Sandwich, Jimmy Houghton, Roger Bly, and many more have been accused of many of these similar allegations..." First off, I don't know KA6JMM personally - not that I'm sure that would matter - so your previous correspondent is - can you imagine? - not telling the truth. In point of fact I have spoken up before when people have crossed-the-line in reference to others; while I did so holding my nose, I spoke out when someone made disgusting comments about Roger Blight's young non-combatant daughter that had no place in the conversation. I don't know what's allegedly been said about "Ham Sandwich" who, like JMM, I don't know, and I don't believe his true identity is known. I wonder whether or not either he or Jimmy Houghten have ever been falsely accused of gross criminal acts like child molestation the way the "Snitchboi" spammer has often accused JMM of such - falsely. I'd like to think that if I was aware of such things, I would speak up in those instances as well.
Comments: Anyone else hear perry chimp-out on the gobblecock guy earlier? such a hood rat....
Comments: Just look at Mr Sammy’s answers. Too much personal insights. He knows KA6JMM all 2 well
Comments: Faggot ass old crying victim Dear steve... You know what to do.
Comments: Someone asked if "Buzz is T-hunting for SPARC?" Well the answer is YES and not only that he has various vehicles at various houses "under surveillance" at various times to see when they leave to go plant radios. Ever heard of GPS Bumper beacons? Not only is he that TALENTED but he is now in possession of EVERY Baofeng you have "misplaced" and will be selling them very soon on the Catalina Swap Net. Any other Dumb Stupid Questions?
Comments: Perry here. QST ***** ZKZ is my drug. 
Comments: Hiiiiiiiii Guuyyys K6MWT AND YOU'RE NOT 
Comments: Why Hammy Sammy do you only fight for one person that has been supposedly slandered on Flamebook. There are many on this platform that could be eligible for your defense and truth services. Ham Sandwich, Jimmy Houghton, Roger Bly, and many more have been accused of many of these similar allegations but they aren't out here with a protecting angel. Please answer in detail Hammy Sammy. I find some of your responses very vague and open ended. Thank you!
Comments: In reply to the peculiar comments of "The Dark Fleas", who said: "Note that in all of what Hammy Sammy wrote he offered no evidence whatsoever that the recordings are incorrect or fake." I find it interest that you state that I pen "decent responses", which you seemingly neither read - or read with comprehension - nor, generally, respond to substantively. As far as it concerns whether or not these particular recordings were "fake", my previous response to "Not the FCC" did not assert that those particular recordings were fake. What I did say was that audio provided in the past by the "Snitchboi" spammer was selectively edited - which it is and was. As for being "incorrect", within the context of the conversations I've been attempting to have with your "team" since March, it's incorrect to assert that any of the audio provided - most at my request - has either been "evidence" of any great wrongdoing on the part of JMM, or that it's been even slightly "provocative". When I think of poor operators, I think of audio such as that that was illustrated in all of those video captures I put up links to in my last response to your alleged associate the "Snitchboi" spammer; nothing either of you have offered amounts to anything more than the mundane, frankly boring conversation of average "good buddy" hams; there is nothing provocative or even controversial in anything audio you've attributed to JMM. In fact, I believe only the last few minutes of your capture which allegedly includes audio over seven different days - an average of just over three minutes per conversation - is JMM allegedly talking directly to a "squeaky", yet you only hear the squeaky in that conversation. So, not to put too fine a point on it, but for all you seem to believe that your alleged many hours of recordings of this obscure, seemingly harmless individual you're so obsessed with amounts to something, all I hear is relatively benign conversation of otherwise model hams who happen to occasionally address an unidentified operator for short a duration. Your work is the equivalent of a busybody neighbor standing outside with a camera watching his neighbor's grass grow, hoping to catch it at the point it grows beyond a certain height so you can bellow far and wide that your neighbor is violating an HOA rule, or perhaps some layabout with a stopwatch trying to catch people doing 40 MPH where it's marked 35, but behaving as though you have Epstein evidence. "All his efforts were directed at attacking our little team, calling names and other keyboard warrior tactics..." The only name which I referred to your "team" by in my previous post was your moniker, "the Dark Fleas". If you're complaining about my previous references to you as, "Dark Sleaze", do remember that members of your so-called "team" accuse people of, among other things, molesting children - falsely. You really are in no position to whine about name calling or these "keyboard warrior" tactics you're referring to; again I'll remind you that your "team" has spent more than half a decade using this site as a platform for defamation and harassment of a person who's greatest "sin" appears to be being highly boring. "The recordings are extremely solid samples of those four hams repeatedly violating part 97..." While exchanging with unidentified operators is a poor practice, the "solid" examples you've provided are, as I said, the equivalent of catching someone doing 40 in a 35 zone and are perhaps, the most ridiculous and petty things you could possibly complain about as far as it concerns violations of the rules or simply bad acting on a SoCal 2m/70cm repeater. When compared to the poor operating practices of, among others, those people singled out by callsign in the video captures I offered previously, these examples pale in comparison. "...and were chosen to show how a bad control operator can encourage others to ignore the rules. As a side note, the repeater owner first asked KA6JMM to step down as control operator. As JMM continued to talk to the squeakies as well as engage in other poor behavior the owner issued an edict that NO ONE was to communicate with the unidentified stations or they would be permanently banned. We have that recording too 😎." While we would find common ground on your initial point, if you're referring to the audio that was posted here recently at my request, then the edict not to communicate with unidentified stationed was issued NOT as a result of JMM or anyone else talking to a "squeaky", but to people on the W6CDW repeater - JMM mostly, but others as well - rightly having bad reactions to unidentified persons - persons who are a part of your "team" - maliciously interfering with the legal communications of licensed stations using vulgar, obscene recordings and whispering voices making homophobic comments about JMM. If you're attempting to assert that the problems on that repeater were due primarily to various operators there talking to "squeakies" while there was no other traffic on the repeater, as opposed to the activities of members of your "team" operating without benefit of call, maliciously interrupting the legal operations of all the legitimate users of that repeater during peak usage - specifically to harass and ridicule JMM - then you're simply being dishonest, and I suspect you know it. As for that final paragraph, there's not good reason to quote it; while you're correct in your assertions, you're also entirely hypocritical; you call out a minor infraction while, if not actively engaging in, support people and fail to call out people who have engaged in much more significant rule violations. There seems to be a lot of sarcasm in your couple of post so, again, I think you know that you're acting in a completely hypocritical way, and that you imagine you're somehow making a legitimate point against a person you have a highly irrational obsession with.
Comments: I want to get Jack onto the SPARC machine. Does he lack a radio and decent antenna? I can donate him a 75W mobile and a decent directional beam.
Comments: Not The FCC, Note that in all of what Hammy Sammy wrote he offered no evidence whatsoever that the recordings are incorrect or fake. All his efforts were directed at attacking our little team, calling names and other keyboard warrior tactics although if he wants to he can pen some decent responses. The recordings are extremely solid samples of those four hams repeatedly violating part 97 and were chosen to show how a bad control operator can encourage others to ignore the rules. As a side note, the repeater owner first asked KA6JMM to step down as control operator. As JMM continued to talk to the squeakies as well as engage in other poor behavior the owner issued an edict that NO ONE was to communicate with the unidentified stations or they would be permanently banned. We have that recording too 😎. Anyhow, JMM continued with his lack of self restraint and the repeater owner permanently banned him. A good example of firm and legal leadership! Antics such as those can be warning signs that you don’t want to be involved with those sorts of hams. Fortunately bad apples are not in the majority. You should find a good local club that is well organized and has online meetings such that you might match up faces and voices. See if there are folks with interests similar to yours and also move swiftly to eliminate bad apples. Let us know how you do.
Comments: Ham Sandwich hasn't posted out here for months. The fucking wordsmith hammy Sammy is a fraud. Go run your bullshit on some other Flamebook.
Comments: "Not The Fcc" The tapes sound legit to me. Hammy Sammy always asks for proof then immediately trashes whatever is offered. It's just his way of having fun but it's nuthin' serious if you read between the lines. Based on that FCC letter you offered you can see those four hams in the recordings are stupidly violating part 97 because they feel as if they are ID'ing themselves and that's good enough. If the FCC chooses to they could nail them. Anyhow, don't be discouraged by 4 bad hams. There's lots of great ones out there so stick with the hobby.
Comments: In reply to "Not the FCC" with regard to the offerings of the so-called "Dark Fleas"... I would be cautious of giving too much legitimacy to anything presented by the "Dark Fleas", in particular the "Snitchboi" spammer who typically appropriates my handle, KA6JMM's call letters, the call letters of other amateur radio operators, the proper names of people who they aren't and all while spreading falsehoods, half-truths and spun truths. They're known for highly selective editing of their audio clips. That said, with what's been provided via the "JMM the Model Ham" Soundcloud page - which falsely asserts to be controlled by KA6JMM and which falsely portrays an innocent Youtuber by the moniker of "Boogie" [who also portrays a character called "Francis"] as though he is JMM to viciously and needlessly mock JMM [and, in effect, "Boogie"] for being overweight - is an example of poor operating practices. Indeed, persons who purport to be model hams should not engage with unidentified stations. In this instance their criticism of JMM is warranted. Unfortunately, this same "group" [of, at best, three people] who refer to themselves as "Dark Fleas" has also followed KA6JMM to multiple repeaters, harassing him with - often vulgar and obscene - recordings over a period of time much longer than the 22:00 minutes of that video, and they've done it while themselves failing to ID - I suspect this is because they don't actually have licenses - and while interfering with licensed operators engaged in legal QSOs. So, consider that when you determine how much weight to give to the ostensibly legitimate criticisms of people known for much more egregious rule violations across a much longer period of time - months, if not years - as compared to these entirely tame technical violations.
Comments: Dark Fleas! These tapes have left me a bit dismayed about ham radio. I had no idea such poor operating behavior extended beyond 435 and 450. I appreciate all the effort to share the recordings and had no idea about the amount of effort required to satisfy my somewhat naive request. I am looking forward to discussing these audio tracks with Hammy Sammy and how the individual hams clearly violated FCC rules by repeatedly communicating with an unidentified station. Someone pointed out to me that sometimes hams will attempt to keep unidentified stations on the air as a means to perform RDF triangulation. However, I would think that would not involve four different hams chatting so casually in the late hours with this "squeeky" character over so many months. I can't believe that the control op woke up in the middle of the night to RDF/chase a few minutes of the squeekies conversation. It would have to be a much larger and coordinated effort; not easy to gear up at 2 in the morning. As I understand it, most repeater groups prefer not to acknowledge the squeekies at all and will keep all RDF efforts a secret.
Comments: Hammy Sammy is SO ANXIOUS for attention he is barfing up posts from "Ham Sandwich" attacking "Hammy Sammy". I guess no one was interested when "Ham Sandwich" was challenging BB to fights that never were to occur. ---This recent "Ham Sandwich" post is pure Hammy Sammy, full of big words and bizarre sentence structure. Especially notable is Hammy Sammy's Signature Accusation of "projection" which is all he ever accomplishes in his limitless manifestos of innuendo and unsubstantiated imputations: "Casual conversation does not require justification of your motives or invasive inquiries of others. Your perspective or projection of your purpose Hammy Sammy on Flamebook is not congruent with the truth. You can post your lengthy and colorful sales pitches here all day but in the end you have sold nothing. NO SALE! Again and again." |
| < Previous 20 | Next 20 > |
Back to THE OFFICIAL 147.450 FLAMEBOOK!